|
|
 | | Author | |
|
| | Date | |
|
|
|
|
Brian Mikiten |
7:14 19 Jun 04 |
|
|
John D Gerndt |
9:11 3 Jul 04 |
|
|
Ross Borgida |
10:14 10 Feb 04 |
|
|
Jorge Gasteazoro |
10:39 10 Feb 04 |
|
|
Ross Borgida |
11:38 10 Feb 04 |
|
|
Walter Glover |
12:10 10 Feb 04 |
|
|
Phil Davis |
17:37 10 Feb 04 |
|
|
David Rude |
22:32 10 Feb 04 |
|
  |
Re: Underexposed Negatives |
|
Ross Borgida |
6:04 11 Feb 04 |
 |
I have made proofs for most of the 4x5 negatives I have and I did not have to burn in specific areas of the image. However, I was contact printing with a Saunders 670cxl condenser enlarger and was not enlarging the image. When scanning with the Epson 3200 scanner and the Silverfast scanner software, I am enlarging the image to over 200% to produce an 8x10 image. I am not sure if enlarging should cause lost of highlight/shadow density in the image??
Also, I am adjusting the gamma on the image during the prescan of the negative w/ the Silverfast software to darken the overall image. Should I be calibrating my scanner in addition to my monitor to match output on the printer?
Thanks
Ross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walter Glover |
10:43 11 Feb 04 |
|
