|
|
 | | Author | |
|
| | Date | |
|
|
|
|
Jorge |
4:02 27 Sep 06 |
|
|
Miles |
16:27 27 Sep 06 |
|
|
Phil Davis |
17:24 27 Sep 06 |
|
|
Miles |
19:43 27 Sep 06 |
|
|
hermit |
19:38 3 Sep 06 |
|
  |
Re: Variable Contrast Papers |
|
hermit |
8:44 9 Sep 06 |
 |
I have retested the Ilford paper. Going from 2 minutes up to 3 minutes developing time has made a big difference and I am getting reasonable curves. I cannot find an error in my analysis, but I am still getting a very compacted range. Everything seems to be saying that I am printing soft. The densitometer was just picked up at auction, but I have calibrated step wedges and references so that isn't the issue. I would appreciate if some one would maybe give me the ES they come up for one of the sets of readings so I can compare them with mine. I have some OLD graded paper and I get the same 'shifted' results.
http://photoforge.org/ilford.html
http://photoforge.org/ilford.xls
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hermit |
17:32 22 Sep 06 |
|
|
Steve Nicholls |
18:10 2 Sep 06 |
|
|
Phil Davis |
8:24 3 Sep 06 |
|
|
Miles |
8:06 2 Sep 06 |
|
