data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6a7a/b6a7aebd15d563c51c12b94087b8a0fe6666a4f0" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05d81/05d81c51909faee3345e8e7954c2c9d760d7424f" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edec3/edec3d7cebccb8060b5c5273f5f316427fb2e4f5" alt="" |
Hi Lance - I prefer using an incident meter over a spot meter. When I first learned the BTZS system I started using the incident meter and found it easier to use.
Also when teaching BTZS workshops I find the incident meter easier for the students to learn and they get good negatives right away. In fact I sold my spot meter a few years ago as I hadn't used it in many years.
Since you are trying both you might try one side of the film holder with the incident meter. It's a good way to learn metering. Using the Expo/Dev software write the information about your metering in the memo section so you can use it as a learning tool. So when you look at your negatives, you can compare the spot meter and incident meter negatives.
Please see Phil Davis's Dexter portfolio - it was the first test of the incident system. If you do have any questions you can call me.
Fred Newman |
|
|
|
|
|