|
| Author | |
|
| Date | |
|
|
|
|
Robert S. Sfeir |
4:57 2 Dec 03 |
|
First let me say NICE. Real nice to see the new Plotter and the matcher works real well.
I have some questions about comparing film and paper. I use the reference curve. In all cases where I use the Seagull G #2 paper with the fims I normal use, I've noticed that the shadows are compressed and the highlights extended.
Am I translating this correctly whereby I understand that a) the print will have less contrast, b) the shadows will lack detail, c) the highlights and middle values will render nicely and not have a 'pasty' harsh feel to them?
Thanks R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phil Davis |
7:17 2 Dec 03 |
|
|
Sandy King |
9:49 8 Nov 03 |
|
|
Phil Davis |
19:24 8 Nov 03 |
|
|
Jorge Gasteazoro |
16:11 10 Nov 03 |
|
|
Sandy King |
17:22 10 Nov 03 |
|
|
Jorge Gasteazoro |
2:38 11 Nov 03 |
|
|
Michael Keslin |
12:08 8 Aug 03 |
|
|
Phil |
16:40 8 Aug 03 |
|
|
Sandy King |
12:10 17 May 03 |
|