data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6a7a/b6a7aebd15d563c51c12b94087b8a0fe6666a4f0" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05d81/05d81c51909faee3345e8e7954c2c9d760d7424f" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edec3/edec3d7cebccb8060b5c5273f5f316427fb2e4f5" alt="" |
I'm afraid you are right on this one. At least as far as I have tried. I scanned in my calibrated step wedge and opened it in Gimp. I thought that if I turned the image into a 'negative' and compressed the scale to that of my step wedge, I might be able to take direct reflection readings using the 'eyedropper' which gives value readings. It didn't work, but my scanner software does 'automatic corrections'. But, I finally scored a densitometer at a reasonable price. Under $115 delivered. Transmission and reflection. The Xrite 810's seem to be the popular choice and used prices seemed too high, so I took a chance on a Macbeth TR927. Since I am technically oriented I never mind having more equipment. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54d79/54d793efde40ae63e79cf34b154cc75deed6db75" alt="" |
|
|
|
|
|