   |
No. More of where I am going is breaking down the 'entry' barrier, ie, buying a densitometer. I don't know much about the digital as I said before. How ever, IF, you could make the scanner behave the same way each scan, you are almost there. What you describe would be nice, but I'm thinking much more basic so I left out the 'ultimate' possibilities. To me that isn't automating the testing procedure but reading a negative before printing. It would be much easier to figure out the contrast range in Gimp and see where the highs and lows are than trying to read points with a densitometer. Also, people are more likely to buy scanners if they don't have them because they can be used for other things. Gimp is free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
