BTZS.org >> Forums home page
 
 General Discussions
 General Discussions

Announcements | General Discussions | Plotter | ExpoDev Palm | Film & Paper Testing | Practical BTZS | ExpoDev for iOS



 
Messages 91 to 100 of 316 (Total: 316) First | Prev | Next | Last
Subject 
Author 
Date 
Re: Recommended Incident meter 
Stephen E. Sample  19:27 13 Nov 07 
Powerdial 
Tim Bowles  15:13 7 Mar 07 
Re: Powerdial 
Phil Davis  9:15 8 Mar 07 
underlying EFS math 
J Michael Sullivan  19:01 15 Nov 06 
Re: underlying EFS math 
Phil Davis  13:11 16 Nov 06 
Scan and Read 
hermit  15:22 23 Aug 06 
Re: Scan and Read 
Miles  17:10 24 Aug 06 
Re: Scan and Read 
hermit  17:44 24 Aug 06 
Re: Scan and Read 
David Jade  19:00 24 Aug 06 
Making the scanner behave consistently is the issue here. Densitometers are highly calibrated instruments that are designed to be very repeatable, scanners however are not.

Then there is the fact that digital imaging is a linear representation and sensitometry is exponential (it's actually more complicated than that thanks to gamma curves). Also by their very nature a digital scanner is designed to compress contrast (thanks to those gamma curves again). Scanners also usually have a real-world density range sensitivity which is lower than a densitomer as well.

This all together makes using the scanner as a reliable densitometer problem pretty tough.

david
 
Re: Scan and Read 
hermit  17:40 22 Sep 06 


BTZS.org >> Forums home page
 
 Note: The BTZS.org forums are now in read-only mode Last Updated: 22 Aug 2002