BTZS.org >> Forums home page
 
 General Discussions
 General Discussions

Announcements | General Discussions | Plotter | ExpoDev Palm | Film & Paper Testing | Practical BTZS | ExpoDev for iOS



 
Messages 161 to 170 of 316 (Total: 316) First | Prev | Next | Last
Subject 
Author 
Date 
BTZS? 
Yves  10:06 6 Dec 04 
Re: BTZS? 
Phil Davis  12:42 6 Dec 04 
Re: BTZS? 
Walter Glover  13:18 6 Dec 04 
Re: BTZS? 
Yves  16:45 6 Dec 04 
Re: BTZS? 
Jorge Gasteazoro  20:04 6 Dec 04 
Re: BTZS? 
Robert S. Sfeir  7:05 23 May 05 
320TXP & Ilfotech DDX 
Walter Glover  14:04 22 Nov 04 
Re: 320TXP & Ilfotech DDX 
David B. Mark  11:38 23 Nov 04 
Hi Walter,

You don't say why you want to know the chemical composition of DD-X. If you are planning on making your own from scratch you can hardly claim to be lazy! Are you concerned about lining up a substitute developer in case Ilford goes under? You might send and e-mail inquiring about this to Photographer's Formulary.

Your results with DD-X as compared to Rodinal suggest that the TXP/DD-X combination produces a less than optimal curve shape, at least for your printing paper. If I understand what Phil Davis has said on this subject, it is pretty hard to modify that curve shape with changes of dilution and/or agitation technique. So if you are convinced that TXP/DD-X is giving you less-than-great low value separation and no midtone "lift" shouldn't you try another developer, rather than waste time experimenting with a combination unlikely to produce the results that you want?

Having said that, let me ask, are you sure of your results? If you look at Phil's tests results of the old TXP you will see that one of the most striking things about it is that choice of developer has a negligible effect on curve shape. Now Phil did not test TXP in Rodinal; but it would surprise me if this developer, alone among popular developers, altered the shape of TXP's characteristic curve.

If you do want to try intermittent agitation techniques with large format film the best device I know for this is the "Cradle" from Summitek. The Cradle is a six-compartment insert that fits a standard 11X14 darkroom tray. There are cutouts in the Cradle that allow developer to circulate freely over and around the negatives. Up to six negatives are loaded in the Cradle; it is then placed in a tray of developer; after development the cradle is moved to the stop bath, and then the fixer, and so on. The advantage of this method over standard tray development is that you keep the films separate, and thus there is no risk of scratching them. I use the Cradle whenever I have 4 to 6 negatives that require exactly the same development time, but I agitate continuously and use the time, temperature, and dilution that would have used for tube development.

If you do manage to achieve the results you are looking for with TXP/DD-X please let us know how you did it.

David
 
Depth of Field at film plane 
Larry Francis  7:55 14 Oct 04 
Re: Depth of Field at film plane 
Walter Glover  15:43 31 Oct 04 


BTZS.org >> Forums home page
 
 Note: The BTZS.org forums are now in read-only mode Last Updated: 22 Aug 2002