data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6a7a/b6a7aebd15d563c51c12b94087b8a0fe6666a4f0" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05d81/05d81c51909faee3345e8e7954c2c9d760d7424f" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edec3/edec3d7cebccb8060b5c5273f5f316427fb2e4f5" alt="" |
I guess my question is whether I should worry that some of the steps on the 4 minute film are blank. Actually, four or five steps.
In the book, it says that if there are four or five steps blank, you should give the film more exposure. But if you do that, won't you be messing up the EFS and the speed point?
For this test, I assumed that an exposure of 2.3 is correct and read the films even though there were these blank steps. I got film speeds of around 120 to 250, instead of the 320 speeds I was getting when I gave the film more exposure. I shot six sheets yesterday in the house using these new curves and I am going to process them today and see what I've got.
--shannon |
|
|
|
|
|