|
|
 | | Author | |
|
| | Date | |
|
|
|
|
Louie Pasto |
19:59 18 Jan 06 |
|
|
Phil Davis |
10:55 19 Jan 06 |
|
|
Louie Pasto |
11:24 19 Jan 06 |
|
|
Steve Nicholls |
4:47 14 Dec 05 |
|
|
Phil Davis |
11:56 14 Dec 05 |
|
|
Steve Nicholls |
2:16 5 Dec 05 |
|
|
Steve Nicholls |
14:55 5 Dec 05 |
  |
I realise I'm answering my own query but on further reading of the BTZS edition 4, I have solved my contrast dilema by slightly increasing my paper value to 1.06.
Also using a piece of black card allowed me to visually see the relationship of shadow and exposure and I was able to see I was over enthusiastic in my placement of the meter too far back in the shadow area.
Slight fine tuning is all it has taken.
Undoubtably I will have more questions as I continue but everything seems to respond in a logical manner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phil Davis |
17:05 5 Dec 05 |
|
|
Steve Nicholls |
18:20 5 Dec 05 |
|
|
Steve Nicholls |
16:21 6 Dec 05 |
|
