data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6a7a/b6a7aebd15d563c51c12b94087b8a0fe6666a4f0" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05d81/05d81c51909faee3345e8e7954c2c9d760d7424f" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edec3/edec3d7cebccb8060b5c5273f5f316427fb2e4f5" alt="" |
I have been using an incident meter with my old Rolleiflex, but a lot of my exposures are overexposed. Surprise! Now I understand that this is because I took the incident reading at face value. But, I'm having trouble figuring out how to use the incident meter more effectively. Obviously, since this is roll film, I can't give each frame its own development time. But I want to at least get the exposures right. What would be the best way to do this? If I'm standing on a road in the shade, say, under some trees, and I take a reading, should I change the ISO to twice normal (that is, underexpose one stop)? And if I'm standing in bright sunlight, should I do the opposite?
--shannon |
|
|
|
|
|