|
|
 | | Author | |
|
| | Date | |
|
|
|
|
Yves |
10:44 19 Jan 05 |
|
|
Shannon Stoney |
10:02 7 Dec 04 |
|
|
Don Bryant |
13:00 7 Dec 04 |
|
|
Yves |
9:01 30 Nov 04 |
|
|
Ross Borgida |
11:31 30 Nov 04 |
|
|
Shannon Stoney |
18:09 24 Nov 04 |
|
|
Don Bryant |
13:02 7 Dec 04 |
|
|
Shannon Stoney |
9:44 21 Nov 04 |
|
  |
Re: weird film test results at 16 min |
|
Jorge Gasteazoro |
11:43 21 Nov 04 |
 |
In my experience it is the rotations that makes a difference. I had a heck of a time calibrating my set up because I was getting higher G bars than what Phil had in the examples files. It was not until I slowed down the rotation that I got the right numbers.
OTOH, IMO you should not worry about the top numbers so much. I would look at the numbers that are within the usable portion of the curve. I presume you are printing on silver, so I would worry more about the numbers from 0.3 to 1.4, you are not going to use the 2.2 or 2.3 numbers anyway.. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David B. Mark |
12:13 23 Nov 04 |
|
