|
|
 | | Author | |
|
| | Date | |
|
|
|
|
Michael Mutmansky |
10:19 3 Dec 02 |
|
|
Phil |
17:59 3 Dec 02 |
|
|
Michael Mutmansky |
7:14 4 Dec 02 |
|
|
Bill Waldron |
13:36 30 Nov 02 |
|
  |
Re: Toning Brilliant VCIII |
|
Bill Waldron |
9:58 22 Dec 02 |
 |
Folks, I'm moving on with my toning tests to my next paper of choice, Kodak Fine Art (FA). This one has a shorter ES than Brilliant and lovely gradation (very open shadows and mid-tones) when coupled with TMY in Ilford's DDX. Some initial tests I did about a month ago suggested that this paper reacts vigorously to selenium toning. I will post my results for any of you who may care to have them. Since I'm still mystified by Brilliant, I plan to return to it after FA and Seagull VC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phil |
18:19 22 Dec 02 |
|
|
Ralph Wood |
7:48 24 Nov 02 |
|
|
Phil Davis |
18:03 30 Nov 02 |
|
|
Mike Sullivan |
17:37 28 Oct 02 |
|
|
Phil |
7:50 29 Oct 02 |
|
