   |
In using btzs testing, I have exposed the step tablet in two ways.
> One is your suggested method using my enlarger. The other is to use
> my camera. For this, I sandwich the step tablet with a piece of film
> and load in a 4x5 holder. The film is exposed in the view camera,
> focusing on a translucent target in front of an evenly illuminated
> background. The results are obviously quite different, which I assume
> relates to flare and other issues.
>
> Question is, does the in camera exposure provide any automatic
> correction for flare when done in this way or is it better to use your
> enlarger method and add back corrections later? Is the in camera
> exposure a better overall measure of what is actually produced with my
> equipment than the enlarger method?
Finally, my tmx family numbers in plotter run (tmaxrs 1:9) 6min to get just over N, 16 min gets to N1.4. Doesn't seem correct to me. What should I be checking with this data?
thanks
bg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
