data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6a7a/b6a7aebd15d563c51c12b94087b8a0fe6666a4f0" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05d81/05d81c51909faee3345e8e7954c2c9d760d7424f" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edec3/edec3d7cebccb8060b5c5273f5f316427fb2e4f5" alt="" |
Ok, I have to admit I am a dyed in the wool ZS user. But being bored the other day I picked my second edition of the BTZS book and started reading through it. So I got to the section of how to use the incident meter and decided to give it a try. I was amazed at how simple it was to arrive at an exposure. So, I understand why add "5" to the SBR but in the book I read the charts that say SBR=4....how come? I mean if I take a light reading and a shadow reading subtract them and then I add 5, the minimum SBR I can get is 5! where did this SBR of 4 comes from? So is now confession time, I always thought the BTZS made a simple thing more difficult than it should, but now that I have tried it I am seeing I might have to eat some crow and learn how to do this. Back in the second edition one had to draw the curves etc, and I was adamant about not spending all this time drawing curves, but now with the plotter etc. Things are a lot easier and the testing should not be any harder than the normal SZ. As a matter of fact doing it with step wedges is a lot easier and less wasteful. So Phil if you explain to me where that SBR of 4 comes from I will be glad to mail you some of the crow feathers left over..data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a7ee/4a7ee9087c960c103a0559800954a6af7be30f34" alt="" |
|
|
|
|
|