|
|
 | | Author | |
|
| | Date | |
|
|
|
|
Steve Nicholls |
16:56 20 May 12 |
|
|
Dr. Elliot Puritz |
16:08 26 Feb 12 |
|
|
David Jade |
13:36 26 Oct 11 |
|
  |
Re: 100TMX - has it changed again? |
|
David Jade |
22:57 26 Oct 11 |
 |
After posting this I realized that I had a few sheets of the Feb. stock still loaded in holders. Long story short, I pulled one out and ran the same test and it matched my previous February test so close the curves overlap. So same film, same results. Newer TMX, thinner results.
My newer box of 100TMX from July is definitely the culprit here. Maybe it's older or a bad batch. Maybe something has changed with newer batches - I hope note. I really don't know at this point though. I'd be curious if anyone else is seeing this. The two boxes were bought from different suppliers, the first one from Feb. came from the View Camera Store and the off-box was bought locally in Seattle from a pro suppler in July. They are different batches as they have different codes on the boxes. I have no idea which one is older stock.
For reference, the odd behaving box has this code on the box: 02GJ0H. I wrote Kodak pro support so if I hear anything I will update this post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randy |
13:00 13 Jul 11 |
|
|
David Jade |
23:57 13 Jul 11 |
|
|
Randy |
5:56 14 Jul 11 |
|
|
David Jade |
0:44 15 Jul 11 |
|
|
Fred Newman |
19:32 14 Jul 11 |
|
|
Ben Wilbur |
11:11 14 Apr 11 |
|
