|  | |  |  | Author |  |  | 
 | |  |  | Date |  |  | 
 | 
|  | 
  |  | 
	|  | Hedd-wyn | 14:58 31 Dec 18 | 
  |  | 
	|  | David Jade | 11:48 2 Jan 19 | 
  |  | 
	|  | Hedd-wyn | 21:15 3 Jan 19 | 
  |  | 
	|  | Filip Lenrick | 6:44 26 Sep 16 | 
  |  | 
	|  | David Jade | 13:34 26 Sep 16 | 
  |  | 
	|  | Filip Lenrick | 23:55 26 Sep 16 | 
  |  | 
	
	| 
	|    | Re: Alternative to contact printing |  | Filip Lenrick | 9:35 8 Oct 16 | 
	
		| 
		|    | 
		| 
		
		| I did some experimentation and a step tablet sandwiched with a film will not fit in a film holder (it almost worked with Atomic-X but not at all with FP4). 
 So lets say I want to do film tests using contact printing, but not using an enlarger.
 
 What do you thing about controlling an appropriate light source using an enlarger-timer with sub-second exposure times (a Paterson P2000 for example)?
 
 To get even enough light, perhaps a Aputure Amaran AL-528S* (or similar) might be a good choice for light source.
 
 *www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1146129-REG/aputure_amaran_al_528s_daylight_led.html
 
 Any thoughts?
 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
  |  | 
	|  | Filip Lenrick | 3:04 31 Oct 16 | 
  |  | 
	|  | August Gresens | 5:09 4 Feb 15 | 
  |  | 
	|  | August Gresens | 5:18 5 Mar 15 | 
|  |