|  | |  |  | Author |  |  | 
 | |  |  | Date |  |  | 
 | 
|  | 
  |  | 
	|  | Hedd-wyn | 14:58 31 Dec 18 | 
  |  | 
	|  | David Jade | 11:48 2 Jan 19 | 
  |  | 
	|  | Hedd-wyn | 21:15 3 Jan 19 | 
  |  | 
	|  | Filip Lenrick | 6:44 26 Sep 16 | 
  |  | 
	|  | David Jade | 13:34 26 Sep 16 | 
  |  | 
	|  | Filip Lenrick | 23:55 26 Sep 16 | 
  |  | 
	|  | Filip Lenrick | 9:35 8 Oct 16 | 
  |  | 
	
	| 
	|    | Re: Alternative to contact printing |  | Filip Lenrick | 3:04 31 Oct 16 | 
	
		| 
		|    | 
		| 
		
		| In Phil Davis' BTZS Video Workshop (from 1992) Phil talks about "toe and flare" and why one cannot simply photograph a step tablet on a light table or similar. Camera flare will raise the toe too much and the computer software cannot work with the curves properly. I assume this logic would also apply to my earlier question if it was possible to sandwich the film and step tablet in a film holder. 
 However, in Ralph Lambrecht's and Chris WoodhouseWay's book "Way Beyond Monochrome" they advise you to photograph the step tablet using a film negative duplicator or similar.
 
 
 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
  |  | 
	|  | August Gresens | 5:09 4 Feb 15 | 
  |  | 
	|  | August Gresens | 5:18 5 Mar 15 | 
|  |