|
|
 | | Author | |
|
| | Date | |
|
|
|
|
Phil Davis |
8:12 28 Jun 04 |
|
|
Michael Carboy |
22:55 4 Jun 03 |
|
|
Phil |
18:13 6 Jun 03 |
|
|
MEC |
11:58 13 Jun 03 |
|
|
Brian Mikiten |
6:35 1 Jun 03 |
|
|
Angelo Micheletti |
8:01 27 Aug 03 |
|
|
Phil |
12:58 25 May 03 |
|
|
michael |
16:21 14 May 03 |
|
  |
Re: metering, palm, exposure, conflicts? |
|
Phil |
6:35 15 May 03 |
 |
Michael --
I can't duplicate your exposure results (my TMY in DDX+6 shows an EFS of 375) but there is a reason for the excessive difference between the meter and Palm recommendations. If you're going to work from the charts you have to DOUBLE the film speeds on the EFS charts because the incident meter isn't supposed to be used this way. The Palm program does this internally. There's also a 1/3- stop difference between the meter setting of 400 and the Palm's computed speed of 500 so. Altogether these things account for 1-1/3 stops. I can't explain the remainder, right offhand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
howard schwartz |
12:06 8 Apr 03 |
|
|
