   |
Phil --
The key word is "consistently" and that suggests that your visualization and metering techniques are well established and reliable. It's still possible that your equipment and/or your methods may affect your EFS or development time, but if these effeccts are consistent you shouldn't have to make these field adjustments more than once or twice if your tests are valid.
I was trying to suggest that you'll get better working data, faster, by establishing a standard testing procedure than by resorting to empirical field adjustments of questionable data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
