|
|
 | | Author | |
|
| | Date | |
|
|
|
|
greg powers |
18:15 26 Mar 11 |
|
|
Fred Newman |
10:16 28 Mar 11 |
|
|
Fred Newman |
11:46 17 Mar 11 |
|
|
Steve Nicholls |
15:14 9 Feb 11 |
|
|
Dr. Elliot Puritz |
18:23 14 Jun 10 |
|
|
Dr. Elliot Puritz |
18:51 14 Jun 10 |
|
|
Elliot |
21:07 13 Feb 10 |
|
|
shannon |
14:50 28 Apr 10 |
|
  |
Re: Testing of new Lodima paper |
|
Elliot |
18:40 29 Apr 10 |
 |
HI Sharon: I think that is about correct because the older Azo Grade 2 was very soft. However, since most of the older paper is gone there is little reason to know that much about it. I can tell you that the new Lodima Grade 3 had an ES of 1.13, and the Grade 2 an ES of 1.25...tested with Amidol as per Michael Smith's formula. Neither grade was "correct" according to current standards. Frankly, I am not at all sure what to make of the testing of Azo type of paper from the standpoint of trying to integrate such testing into the BTZS scheme.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miles |
16:28 11 Jan 10 |
|
