data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6a7a/b6a7aebd15d563c51c12b94087b8a0fe6666a4f0" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05d81/05d81c51909faee3345e8e7954c2c9d760d7424f" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edec3/edec3d7cebccb8060b5c5273f5f316427fb2e4f5" alt="" |
Hi, I did the whole testing process, and shot about 50 4x5 negatives this past summer based on those tests, using the ExpoDev software on my Palm. I am back in the darkroom now, processing those negs, and they are all way underdeveloped. The highlights are in the range of 0.9. I had a feeling something was wrong, because ExpoDev was telling me that for HP5+, at an SBR of 8.4, the development time should be four minutes! Well, I did that and got the predictable result: underdeveloped highlights. Where did I probably go wrong in the testing process? I used distilled water, processed test and regular negs at 68 degrees in tubes, etc. I was unsure of whether I exposed the test negs correctly, though. My incident meter only reads down to about 3, and it's a small, cheap one. |
|
|
|
|
|