|
|
 | | Author | |
|
| | Date | |
|
|
|
|
Robert McColloch |
11:00 11 Jan 03 |
|
|
Phil |
19:03 11 Jan 03 |
|
|
Mike Kilkeary |
18:42 4 Jan 03 |
|
|
Phil |
18:01 5 Jan 03 |
|
|
howard schwartz |
7:57 2 Jan 03 |
|
|
Phil |
12:07 2 Jan 03 |
|
|
clay |
12:07 6 Jan 03 |
  |
It seems that you could put a step wedge in the enlarger and expose as follows:
-1 5
100% 0%
75% 25%
50% 50%
25% 75%
0% 100%
Where the percentage is the percentage of total exposure time. I'd probably pick 20 seconds or some other number that is easy to calculate and adjust the f-stop on the enlarger lens to give the proper exposure for the step wedge. Plotting up the resulting reflection densities ought to give you a pretty decent idea of the relative ES and speed of these combinations and allow you to interpolate for the 'in-between' combinations. Is this too simplistic?
Clay
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phil |
12:29 6 Jan 03 |
|
|
Michael Mutmansky |
7:28 3 Dec 02 |
|
|
Phil |
9:27 3 Dec 02 |
|
