data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6a7a/b6a7aebd15d563c51c12b94087b8a0fe6666a4f0" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05d81/05d81c51909faee3345e8e7954c2c9d760d7424f" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edec3/edec3d7cebccb8060b5c5273f5f316427fb2e4f5" alt="" |
Hi all, I was looking at the Agfa paper I have and it has an ES of 1.35 for grade 2 under my enlarger [Devere 504] and I was wondering how others approach their testing.
[1] Do you test your film based on an ES of 1 in plotter and adjust later for the paper ES of 1.35 or whatever --
or
[2] Do you adjust you dilution to give you an appropriate SBR range based on the ES of 1.35.
If [1] and you get an SBR of lets say 10 ish for the 4 minute test film then when you apply the ES of 1.35 the 4 minute SBR will extend out to about 13 or more -- and -- when you add in a flare factor the SBR extends further.
or do you process your 4 minute test to give say an SBR of 8 so that when the ES of 1.35 is applied the 4 minute development time reflects a more realistic SBR of about 10?
I'm not sure what differences there would be in the two negatives -- any takers data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a7ee/4a7ee9087c960c103a0559800954a6af7be30f34" alt=""
Steve |
|
|
|
|
|