|
|
 | | Author | |
|
| | Date | |
|
|
|
|
Miles |
7:28 1 Jan 07 |
|
|
Miles |
7:41 1 Jan 07 |
|
|
John Fontana |
14:05 1 Jan 07 |
|
|
Miles |
22:01 1 Jan 07 |
|
|
Miles |
17:54 19 Nov 06 |
|
|
Phil Davis |
19:03 19 Nov 06 |
|
|
Miles |
9:41 20 Nov 06 |
|
|
Miles |
8:17 1 Oct 06 |
|
|
Phil Davis |
9:21 1 Oct 06 |
|
|
Miles |
10:59 1 Oct 06 |
  |
Thanks Phil, I was aware of the expodev feature but was curious about the relationship of the flare density viewing feature and the expodev feature. In other words if I exported the density value would that have the same effect as using the expodev feature and now I appreciate that exporting would be infact problematic. I happened to notice that when I added .02 flare density to my set of curves for 100Tmax DDX 1+7 the over all effects were to make the developement charts almost identical with the library 100Tmax DDX 1+6 devel. values. just a curiosity I suppose. I just finished a field test designed to compare my most recent recal. with the library values. The negative pairs look very simular on view though there were small differences in exposure and processing values. This p.m. I will put them to the paper test , after all the proof is in the print...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
