|
|
 | | Author | |
|
| | Date | |
|
|
|
|
David Rude |
12:27 25 Feb 03 |
|
|
Robert Pyle |
15:21 18 Dec 02 |
  |
Hi Phil:
I just received and installed the new version of ExpoDev for the Palm and was comparing the exposure recommendations with what I was obtaining with the older version I had been using (v 1.0.0330). I use TMX in TRS 1+9 with ES=1. I found that the new version recommended about twice the exposure as the older version and I guess that is due to the reciprocity factor I selected when exporting the files from WinPlotter. I found the negatives I was obtaining with the older version of ExpoDev printed fine and am now wondering if I may have choosen the wrong correction factor. I selected C3 from the available options. Is there a correction factor that would be closer to the older values I was obtaining?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phil |
20:15 18 Dec 02 |
|
|
Michael Keslin |
15:10 9 Dec 02 |
|
|
Phil |
9:48 10 Dec 02 |
|
|
Patrick Troccolo |
15:15 24 Oct 02 |
|
|
Phil |
19:16 24 Oct 02 |
|
|
Clay Harmon |
10:53 24 Oct 02 |
|
|
David Rude |
15:00 24 Oct 02 |
|
|
David Rude |
13:22 21 Oct 02 |
|
