data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6a7a/b6a7aebd15d563c51c12b94087b8a0fe6666a4f0" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05d81/05d81c51909faee3345e8e7954c2c9d760d7424f" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edec3/edec3d7cebccb8060b5c5273f5f316427fb2e4f5" alt="" |
as a neophyte photographer to large format for about 4 years, i first heard and learned the btz system from fred newman and the books by phil davis. my negatives are infinitely better, and as a consequence, my prints are superior in quality and very much easier to print. the film testing is really not that tedious if you don't get bogged down in doing many, many tests. i have so far only tested two developer/film combinations. it only takes about an hour of so to do the film test, and probably another 15-20 minutes to input the data in the winplotter software. i think it is inviting, but wrong, to spend all your time doing test after test, when really a good working knowledge of a small number of materials is all that is needed to expose and develope good negatives. the computer software is a breeze, and the information is very usable, and i think understandable. i might also add that the btz tube system of developement is great. no more working in the dark, and the developement is even across the entire negative. i still use the zone system and not the incident system as touted by phil, but on occasion, i use that system as well. after having read "beyond the zone system" (more than once!), i feel that i have a much better understanding of the exposure/developement/print process and photography in general. certainly, you can take and print excellent images without the btz system, but i would encourage everyone to give it try. it is really worth it! and the time well spent!! |
|
|
|
|
|